Tech

Random User Agent Generator

Realistic User Agents for Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Edge on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS. For testing, fixtures, logs and varied-traffic simulation.

Instant🔒In your browserNo signup
Live

What the User Agent is

The User Agent is a string your browser sends in every HTTP request, in the User-Agent header. It identifies the software making the request: browser, version, operating system, and sometimes extra details like rendering engine.

A typical Chrome on Windows 11 UA looks like:

  • Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

That structure is historical. Mozilla/5.0 leads because old servers expected "Mozilla" before serving modern content. AppleWebKit and KHTML appear because Chrome derived from WebKit, which derived from KHTML. It's a 30-year fossil of compatibility.

Legitimate use cases

  1. Automated testing. Verify your system correctly detects mobile/desktop, specific browser and serves the right bundle.
  2. Log fixtures. Populate analytics tables with varied UAs to test dashboards.
  3. Bot detection. Validate your service rejects suspicious UAs (empty, "curl/7.x", "python-requests/").
  4. Visual demos. Show screenshots with realistic UAs instead of "user-agent-1".
  5. Bug reports. If a user reports a bug "in their browser", reproduce with their exact UA.

The future: Client Hints

Chrome and others are reducing the detail in the traditional User Agent as an anti-fingerprinting measure. Instead, they promote User-Agent Client Hints: separate HTTP headers (Sec-CH-UA, Sec-CH-UA-Platform, Sec-CH-UA-Mobile) the server explicitly requests when it needs them.

In practice, the traditional UA still works and will keep working for a while, but it carries less and less useful information. If your logic depends on the UA for anything serious, start migrating to Client Hints.

When NOT to use fake User Agents

  • To violate terms of service. If a site bans scraping in its ToS, faking the UA doesn't legalize it.
  • To access geo-restricted content. The UA doesn't include geo. You need a VPN, and that's regulated by your country's laws.
  • To impersonate a real user. If the UA goes alongside another user's cookies, that's fraud.
  • To evade usage metrics. If your app charges per device, faking UAs may violate the contract.

Modern bot detection

Ten years ago, the User Agent was enough to separate humans from bots. Today, serious anti-bot systems (Cloudflare, hCaptcha, Akamai) use dozens of signals:

  • TLS fingerprint (JA3/JA4): how your client negotiates the handshake.
  • HTTP/2 fingerprint: order and priority of headers.
  • Client Hints: the server requests a value and compares it to expectations.
  • Mouse and keyboard behavior.
  • Canvas fingerprint, WebGL fingerprint.
  • Persistent cookies.

Just changing the UA and expecting to pass as human doesn't work against these systems. Talk to the site if you need programmatic access — most have an API.

UA vs userAgentData

In modern browsers you can use navigator.userAgentData for structured info instead of parsing the string. It returns an object with brands, mobile, platform. It's the JS equivalent of Client Hints. Compatibility: all recent Chromium; Firefox and Safari haven't shipped it yet.

FAQ

What is the User Agent?

String the browser sends in every HTTP request to identify itself. The server uses it to adapt the response.

Why generate them?

Functional tests, log fixtures, bot detection, demos and bug reports.

Help avoid scraping blocks?

Only partially. Today UA combines with TLS fingerprint and behavior. UA alone guarantees nothing.

Being phased out?

Yes. Migration to User-Agent Client Hints (Sec-CH-UA). Traditional UA still works with shrinking content.

Was this generator useful?